In my work with children who have Auditory Processing Disorder (APD), it can be difficult to understand how some kids can hear (that is, their ears themselves work fine) the brain can process the sounds correctly.
This week, the New York Times published an article explaining exactly why listening can be so difficult for anyone — let alone children affected by auditory processing challenges or listening problems!
Though the article doesn’t mention APD or listening challenges, it certainly applies:Imagine how overwhelming all these incoming sounds are for a child who can’t process them well.
This makes me think of how kids who have APD can be misdiagnosed with an attention deficit disorder (ADD). We automatically assume a person who doesn’t, or can’t, listen is not paying attention.
Perhaps that’s why kids with auditory processing challenges so often fall into heartbreaking, emotional meltdowns when they can’t understand in a noisy environment.
Why Listening Is So Much More Than Hearing – NYTimes.com.
The best thing any parent, teacher, or caretaker can do for any child who struggles to listen is to understand how difficult listening really is. Most people can turn most environment sounds “off” (except for the alarming ones) and focus on what you need to hear without ever thinking about it. But most of us have also been accused of not listening. Perhaps we don’t always want to use the energy to focus our attention properly on someone speaking to us.
Children with APD can’t make their ears and brain work together in many situations, making them unable — not unwilling! — to listen.
All children have trouble with listening skills at time, and all children can benefit from parents and educators who help them develop them. But if you think your child struggles much more that his peers, please take a look at some of our resources and give us a call.
Call the Auditory Processing Center at CHC: (917) 305-7850
Tags: apd, CHC kids, moma
Hello,I listened to the idtronuction to your presentation of the PST program. I have been using a different approach that is a variation of Jack’s recorded version. Has the recorded version been updated? I have used the recorded version as an exemplar, however, I have integrated the PST with temporal and spatial relationships. After my first attempt to pass undergraduate phonetics, it became apparent that hearing and seeing phonemes was not sufficient to apprehend selected aspects of language. To be certain, I do not attempt to separate auditory and language processing. The Buffalo Model just makes sense .I wish you well, as we attempt to decipher disparate communication behaviors into coherent thought.Sincerely,Willard C. Hooks, Jr. Ph.D. CCC-A/SLP
Thanks for reading! Not sure about your question. Best of luck in your work.